Beyondordinary.
Considered foodservice environments, designed for the way people really work.
Form meets function.
Every detail has a purpose. Every space has a story.
Designed to deliver.
Explore the places, projects and possibilities behind our work.
DOVETAIL FOODSERVICE DESIGN
We sit firmly on your side of the table.
Commercial kitchen projects can quickly become complicated. Unclear specifications, incomparable quotations, variations and unresolved technical requirements can all add unnecessary cost.
Dovetail brings clarity from the outset, defining the brief, removing ambiguity and ensuring everyone is working towards the same result.
OUR PROCESS
From first conversation to final delivery
Every project is different. Our approach is tailored to your requirements, with Dovetail providing the expertise and support you need at every stage.
WE LISTEN
We start by understanding your operation, objectives, budget and what you need from the space.
WE ASSESS
We review the site, existing equipment and technical requirements to identify opportunities and constraints.
WE DESIGN
We develop practical layouts and equipment solutions around how the space will actually be used.
WE REFINE
We review the design, specification and costs with you and the wider project team, incorporating feedback along the way.
WE DELIVER
We provide the drawings, specifications and technical information needed to support tendering, procurement and installation.
WE SUPPORT
Where required, we remain involved through installation, coordination and snagging to help deliver the project as intended.
FOODservice DESIGN INSIGHTS
GREAT KITCHEN DESIGN
STARTS EARLY.
The decisions made at the beginning of a project can have a lasting impact on how a commercial kitchen performs.
Discover why involving a foodservice design consultant early can help avoid costly changes, improve efficiency and deliver a better result.
EXPLORE OUR PROJECTS →SECTORS & EXPERIENCE
Expertise Across Foodservice
Dovetail works across a diverse range of sectors, bringing practical foodservice expertise to projects of every scale.
Foodservice Operators
Independent foodservice design and equipment advice, helping operators create practical spaces and make informed investment decisions.
Architects
Specialist foodservice design and technical support, providing the drawings, specifications and services information needed to integrate catering requirements into the wider project.
Main Contractors
Practical design, technical and project support from coordination through to installation, helping ensure foodservice elements are delivered correctly and on programme.
Cost & Construction Consultants
Clear design, cost and technical information to support feasibility, budgeting, tendering and value engineering throughout the project.
3D VISUALISATION
SEE THE SPACE
BEFORE IT'S BUILT.
Bring your project to life before work begins. Our 3D visualisation helps you explore layouts, understand the space and make confident design decisions.
EXPLORE OUR DESIGN SERVICES →
OUR SERVICES
Supporting every stage of your project.
From early stage design and independent consultancy through to project delivery, operations and equipment, Dovetail brings practical expertise wherever you need it.
PREVIOUSLY SUPPORTED CLIENTS
Experience across leading organisations
INSIGHTS
Ideas, experience and practical advice.
Is Commercial Kitchen Energy Monitoring Actually Worth It?
Ten reasons why it can transform your kitchen operations — and one reason it often doesn't. Energy monitoring sounds like one of those things that should automatically make sense. Lower costs. Better sustainability. Reduced waste. Improved efficiency. But in reality, many monitoring systems end up becoming another login, another dashboard, another monthly report that nobody reads. That does not mean monitoring is ineffective. It usually means there is no operational structure around the information being collected. In our experience, commercial kitchen energy monitoring is absolutely worth it in most cases — but only when the data is actively reviewed, interpreted and discussed by people who understand kitchen operation properly. Done correctly, monitoring becomes far more than utility tracking. It becomes an operational decision-making tool. Here are 10 reasons why commercial kitchen energy monitoring can genuinely add value. 1. It creates visibility where there usually is none Most operators can see their utility bill. Very few can confidently explain what equipment is driving usage, where waste occurs, or how operational behaviour affects consumption. Monitoring helps move kitchens away from assumptions and toward evidence. 2. Small operational habits become visible Many kitchens quietly develop energy-intensive routines over time: Extraction left running unnecessarily Equipment idling between service periods Inefficient startup and shutdown procedures Overnight running Poor warewashing habits Individually, these may seem minor. Repeated every day, they become expensive. 3. Long-term patterns begin to appear Commercial kitchens rarely behave consistently all year round. Energy usage changes with seasonality, staffing, occupancy, menu cycles, weather and operational drift. One month shows data. Long-term monitoring shows patterns. 4. Maintenance issues often show warning signs early One of the biggest hidden benefits of monitoring is maintenance visibility. Equipment that is starting to struggle often changes its energy behaviour before failure occurs. This is especially true with refrigeration, cold rooms, extraction systems and warewashing equipment. Abnormal usage patterns can sometimes indicate: Failing components Blocked condensers Worn seals Poor maintenance regimes Developing faults 5. It may help reduce food loss and disruption A refrigeration failure can be hugely expensive operationally. Food spoilage, emergency repairs, downtime and service disruption can quickly outweigh the cost of monitoring. Spotting unusual refrigeration behaviour early may help identify problems before complete failure occurs. 6. It strengthens the business case for investment Many operators already suspect certain equipment is inefficient. Monitoring helps provide the evidence needed to justify: Replacement equipment Refurbishment projects Refrigeration upgrades Extraction improvements Sustainability investment Data-backed decisions are usually easier to approve than assumptions. 7. It supports sustainability and compliance goals Many organisations are under increasing pressure to demonstrate sustainability progress, accountability, operational responsibility and carbon awareness. Monitoring creates traceable operational information that supports those conversations properly — and gives your leadership team something concrete to report. 8. Saving money is often easier than generating more revenue Saving £1 in operational cost is often more valuable than generating several pounds in additional sales. Once staffing, overheads and taxation are considered, operational efficiency improvements can have a surprisingly powerful effect on profitability. 9. It creates accountability What gets measured gets managed. Once teams can see patterns, behaviours, anomalies and operating routines, there is usually greater awareness and ownership around kitchen operation. Visibility changes behaviour. 10. The consultative element matters more than the software This is probably the most important point of all. Monitoring only becomes truly valuable when somebody reviews the information, interprets the patterns, understands kitchen operation, and helps turn the findings into practical action. Without that, monitoring risks becoming just another portal nobody logs into. The software collects the information. The real value comes from understanding what the information actually means. The bigger picture Commercial kitchen energy monitoring is not simply about reducing utility bills. Done properly, it can improve: Operational visibility and decision-making Maintenance planning and equipment lifespan Accountability and team ownership Sustainability reporting and carbon tracking Investment decisions and business cases Long-term kitchen performance The question is not really whether monitoring is worth it. The question is whether there is the right operational structure and expertise around the data to make it genuinely useful. That is exactly what Dovetail Foodservice Design helps organisations put in place — independent, practical expertise that turns energy information into operational action. Want to take it further? Our sister company Procure has developed a dedicated commercial kitchen energy monitoring service built specifically around the principles outlined in this article — combining monitoring technology with the operational consultancy expertise to make it genuinely useful. Visit: www.procure.ac/energy to view the full details and sign up. Talk to Dovetail about your kitchen's energy performance — dovetailfsd.co.uk About the author Steve Brophy is Managing Partner at Dovetail Foodservice Design, specialist commercial kitchen design consultants providing independent advice, practical solutions and better outcomes for organisations across Education, Healthcare and Hospitality. dovetailfsd.co.uk
Repair or Replace? Knowing When Your Catering Equipment Has Reached End of Life
One of the most consequential decisions a kitchen manager makes is also one of the least glamorous: whether to repair a piece of equipment or replace it. Get it wrong in either direction and you pay for it, either in unnecessary capital spend or in mounting repair bills, lost productivity, and operational risk. The honest answer is that there is no universal rule. But there are clear indicators, and a structured approach to reading them makes the decision considerably easier. What 'End of Life' Actually Means End of life does not mean the machine has stopped working. It means the ongoing cost, in money, time, and operational disruption , of keeping it running outweighs the cost of replacing it. That crossover point is often reached earlier than operators expect, particularly in high-volume environments where the pressure on equipment is relentless. The Warning Signs Repair frequency is the most obvious indicator. A machine that needed attention once a year and now needs it every quarter is telling you something. When individual repair costs start approaching 20–40% of the replacement value, the arithmetic begins to shift. Energy consumption matters too, and it is often overlooked. Older equipment is simply less efficient than modern alternatives, not because it is broken, but because the technology has moved on. The annual utility cost difference between an ageing combi oven and a current-generation model can be substantial, and that gap compounds every year you delay. Parts availability is a harder limit. When components become difficult to source or carry long lead times, a single breakdown can put a kitchen out of action for days. That is an operational and reputational risk no business should accept if a replacement is available. Inconsistent performance, cooking cycles that produce variable results, temperatures that no longer hold, degrades service quality in ways that are hard to quantify but very easy for customers to notice. And compliance concerns are non-negotiable: equipment that no longer meets hygiene or safety standards must be replaced regardless of its mechanical condition. A Framework for the Decision A useful starting point is the 50% rule: if a single repair will cost more than 50% of the replacement value, replace. If cumulative repair costs over the past two years have exceeded that figure, replacement is almost certainly overdue. Alongside cost, consider the realistic remaining lifespan. A repair that buys 18 months on a machine already at 12 years old may be poor value compared with a planned replacement now, budgeted properly and installed at a time of your choosing rather than in an emergency. The Case for Lifecycle Planning The businesses that handle this best are the ones that are never surprised by it. They maintain an asset register — purchase dates, service history, expected lifespan, and they review it regularly. They budget for capital replacement in advance rather than scrambling reactively when a machine fails mid-service. This approach does not eliminate difficult decisions. But it does mean those decisions are made with full information, at a time of your choosing, with appropriate options on the table. Whole-Life Cost, Not Purchase Price The final consideration is one that procurement teams sometimes resist: the total cost of ownership. A lower-spec machine purchased at a lower price may cost more over five years than a better-specified alternative, once energy consumption, maintenance frequency, and reliability are factored in. When assessing replacement options, look beyond the capital figure. Consider energy ratings, warranty terms, parts availability, and the manufacturer's track record in high-demand environments. The cheapest option at point of purchase is rarely the cheapest option over time. Recognising the end of life point for catering equipment is a management discipline. The cost of acting too late is almost always higher than the cost of acting a little too early, in disruption, in emergency spend, and in the cumulative drain of keeping the wrong equipment running.
Total Cost of Ownership: Why Purchase Price is the Wrong Starting Point
Capital budgets drive procurement decisions. That is understandable, capital is visible, accountable, and relatively easy to compare. But in commercial kitchen equipment, purchase price is a poor proxy for value. The business case for any piece of equipment plays out over years, not at the point of invoice. Total Cost of Ownership, the combined cost of purchasing, installing, operating, maintaining, and eventually replacing a piece of equipment, is a more meaningful metric. It is also one that, in our experience, is rarely applied consistently at the point of procurement. What TCO Actually Includes The calculation starts with capital and installation, but extends to annual energy and water consumption, maintenance and servicing costs, consumables and replacement parts, the cost of downtime (direct and indirect), and ultimately the replacement cycle and disposal. Each of these can vary significantly between two pieces of equipment that appear broadly comparable on specification sheets. Energy: The Most Significant Long-Term Variable Energy prices have remained volatile, and the operational cost of running inefficient equipment compounds over time. The annual energy cost difference between two combi ovens of similar specification but different efficiency ratings can be meaningful over a five or ten-year ownership period. In some cases, that difference alone is larger than the upfront price gap between the two options. Standby and idle consumption is worth specific attention, equipment that sits in a busy kitchen for periods between services may run at idle for more hours than it runs at capacity. Efficient idle consumption is not a marginal consideration. Heat output also matters in an integrated kitchen design context. Equipment that generates significant ambient heat increases the cooling load on refrigeration and ventilation, creating costs that may not be attributed back to the original procurement decision but are nonetheless real. Reliability and Downtime In high-volume operations, a single day of unexpected downtime carries costs that are rarely fully captured in financial reporting but are nonetheless significant. Emergency callout fees, lost productivity, menu simplification, and in some cases reputational damage to the operation all follow from equipment failure at the wrong moment. Higher-quality equipment typically offers longer warranty periods, better parts availability, and more responsive manufacturer support. These are not abstract benefits, they translate directly into reduced downtime risk over the ownership period. Maintenance Planning from Day One The ease and cost of ongoing maintenance should be part of the procurement conversation, not an afterthought. Are serviceable components accessible without significant dismantling? Are parts proprietary or widely available? Is there local technical support with appropriate response times? What is the realistic maintenance schedule and annual cost? Kitchen design also plays a role here. Equipment specified without adequate service access creates labour costs and disruption every time maintenance is required. That is an avoidable lifetime cost that starts at the design stage. Sustainability and Future Compliance Regulatory direction on energy performance and environmental reporting is clear, even if specific requirements continue to evolve. Equipment that is energy-efficient and well-specified today is less likely to require premature replacement to meet future standards. That is a form of cost avoidance that is genuinely difficult to quantify but worth factoring into a long-term investment decision. Making TCO Work in Practice Total cost of ownership analysis is most valuable when it is applied at feasibility stage, before procurement decisions are made, rather than retrospectively. It requires engagement between operators, designers, consultants, and suppliers early in the process, when options are still open and design decisions have not yet been locked in. The goal is not to make procurement more complicated. It is to make it more accurate, to ensure that the decisions made at point of purchase reflect the true cost of ownership, rather than simply the cost of acquisition. The cheapest option at the point of purchase is rarely the cheapest option over time. The most considered option usually is.
PLANNING YOUR NEXT FOODSERVICE PROJECT?
